Results-based budgeting the new approach in Budgeting for donor funds
Results-based budgeting is not new, having been used for a number of years in both the public and
private sectors of several developed and developing countries. RBM is a new management approach
focused on achieving results; a broad management strategy aimed at changing the way agencies
operate, with improving performance and achieving results as the central orientation. RBB is about
formulating programme budgets that are driven by a number of desired results which are
articulated at the outset of the budgetary process, and against which actual performance is
measured at the end of a biennium.
In 1997, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan launched a comprehensive
reform initiative and proposed shifting from programme budgeting to results-based budgeting
(RBB). This was a significant shift in budgeting techniques in the United Nations. Since the 1990s,
the major Specialized Agencies of the United Nations system such as World Bank, WHO,
UNESCO, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) have adopted results-based or performance-based budgeting systems. Other
organizations, such as the International Labour Organization (ILO), the United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF), the Universal Postal Union (UPU) and the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO), have now also adopted RBB.
What is results-based budgeting?
Organizations define RBB in different ways; however all definitions revolve around the concept of
aligning resources behind results. Along the definition of RBB offered by the Secretary General of
the United Nations, RBB is a results-driven budgeting process in which:
· Programme formulation and resources justification involve a set of predefined objectives,
expected results, outputs, inputs and performance indicators which constitute a ‘logical
framework’;
· Expected results justify resource requirements, which are derived from — and linked to —
outputs to be delivered, with a view to achieving such results; and
· Actual performance in achieving results is measured by predefined performance indicators.
This definition captures the main features of RBB, namely: objectives, expected results, outputs,
and performance indicators. The following definitions provide the conceptual starting point for
our discussion of results and performance accountability.
The Question is whats the way forward for the Developing Countries in preparations of their budgets to suit the RBB system for better fundng and Reporting?
private sectors of several developed and developing countries. RBM is a new management approach
focused on achieving results; a broad management strategy aimed at changing the way agencies
operate, with improving performance and achieving results as the central orientation. RBB is about
formulating programme budgets that are driven by a number of desired results which are
articulated at the outset of the budgetary process, and against which actual performance is
measured at the end of a biennium.
In 1997, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan launched a comprehensive
reform initiative and proposed shifting from programme budgeting to results-based budgeting
(RBB). This was a significant shift in budgeting techniques in the United Nations. Since the 1990s,
the major Specialized Agencies of the United Nations system such as World Bank, WHO,
UNESCO, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) have adopted results-based or performance-based budgeting systems. Other
organizations, such as the International Labour Organization (ILO), the United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF), the Universal Postal Union (UPU) and the World Meteorological Organization
(WMO), have now also adopted RBB.
What is results-based budgeting?
Organizations define RBB in different ways; however all definitions revolve around the concept of
aligning resources behind results. Along the definition of RBB offered by the Secretary General of
the United Nations, RBB is a results-driven budgeting process in which:
· Programme formulation and resources justification involve a set of predefined objectives,
expected results, outputs, inputs and performance indicators which constitute a ‘logical
framework’;
· Expected results justify resource requirements, which are derived from — and linked to —
outputs to be delivered, with a view to achieving such results; and
· Actual performance in achieving results is measured by predefined performance indicators.
This definition captures the main features of RBB, namely: objectives, expected results, outputs,
and performance indicators. The following definitions provide the conceptual starting point for
our discussion of results and performance accountability.
The Question is whats the way forward for the Developing Countries in preparations of their budgets to suit the RBB system for better fundng and Reporting?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Wilmot Reeves on -
Rwakajara Arthur Rodney,
I find your article on RBB very interesting. From a personal view point, I see RBB as the most prudent and pro-poor development oriented way of ensuring that resources are used to positively impact lives. It is all about achieving the best results in programme implementation. In this situation, resources must be tied and programmed to time bound deliverables, all aimed at avoiding wastage and squandering.
Therefore, in response to your question about the way forward for developing countries in preparations of budgets to the RBB system, I would first like to indicate that there should be, from the highest level, the political will on the part of leaders in developing economies to adopt this system. Next, it would be important for the system and structures to be put in place to ensure the smooth implementation of programme; this will entail institutional capacity building and creating the enabling environment. Lastly, investment in human capital, those responsible for implementing programmes, must be seriously considered. In other words, capacity building, approached from the following three angles (human, institutional and the enabling environment) must be seriously considered before results-based budgeting system. Otherwise, it will be waste of resources because there will be no system and the trained staff to implement the programme.
Regards,
Wilmot A. Reeves
Latest Activity
Dear Hannah,
Greetings!
Thank you for initiating and leading this interesting topic discusion. The questions that you have put forward are thought provoking and i tried to address the questions as much as possible as far as the Ethiopian experienc…
1. Yes, Ethiopia has its own national plan, which mainly focuses on poverty eradication as replied before .Although the PRSP process started in2000 as a process largely between government and the donors, it has now evolved beyond that, and the PASDE…
1) Yes, Rwanda has a PRSP/National Development Plan,
2) and 3) Yes, the M & E plan is operational as the Department of Statistics and the Strategic Planning and Monitoring Unit within MINECOFIN are jointly responsible for the general coordination of…
Rwanda PRSP goals are in line with the MDGs, with clear targets for poverty reduction over time. Some progress has been made toward achieving some of the MDGs. For example, access to health services has improved and the Government is likely to achie…
Thank you all for the appreciation. We hope we will always receive your support and sharing of experiences so that our CoP grows to meet its goals. Thank you very much.
Solomon
Indeed s other have said this is great stuff! I was previledged to participate in the launch and I must say I was impressed with the crossesction of people participated in the formation of the ZimCoP! There is government support at the Highe…
Dear Colleagues,
First, many thanks to Sheka and to Abiyot, for providing and in depth overview of their country’s PRSP/National Development Strategy.
Sheka it is very interesting that you note that “If you get M&E right at the base level input-ou…
Thanks James. So why is it that these governments do not work with partners to ensure effective mentoring programs? What alternative knowledge management mechanisms should fragile countries adopt to allow for project sustainability and of course dev…
This is very interesting topic for discussion and I am pleased to bring my experience from Liberia to bear on this topic:
1. The complexity and dynamics of reconstruction in post-conflict and fragile environments lead to interventions from multiple…
Well done Solomon- we are slowly getting to the tipping point. I hope you will have a chance of sharing some of the challenges you encountered and what others should watch if they want to have a successful launch.
All the best-
A place for members to submit documents and articles to the AfCoP electronic library.
Hello Dear Sheka
i want to thank you for your contribution and your strong analyze.Your point exactly what i wanted to demonstrate in my masters degree thesis oriented on result based management.
Well as you mentioned ,there is no coordination betwe…
The Socio-Economic Governance and Management Branch (SGMB) of the United Nations’ Department of Public Administration and Development Management (DPADM/DESA) organized an international workshop on “Engaging Citizens in Development Management and P…
© 2010 Created by copafrica.
