Is this the solution in Zimbabwe's government departments?
Is there any improvement from the traditional approach?
Where would we need to improve for the concept to be as effective?
Did we really need it in the first place?
Who is the brainchild of this concept?
After years of monitoring the implementation of programmes and projects in government departments it was noted that progress was not at the levels desirable. An analysis of government management systems was done and it was noted that the systems needed to be improved. In 2004, government decided on the RBM as the best system to implement.
It was introduced in all Goovernment in 2005.
Where we need to improve is the by-in from the level of Ministers and Heads of Ministries as well as a strong "change management programme" for senior manangement levels in government because old habits die hard.
The introduction of RBM was a government decision as you might be aware the Zimbbwe has not had donor support since year 2000.
Parliamentarians in democratic societies play a crucial role in ensuring budgetary oversight, budgets that in developing countries often consist of a high proportion of international development aid. By ensuring aid funds are accounted for and trans…
In January 2010, the AfCoP’s Core Management Team members acknowledged that the objectives of the first three-year plan have been achieved and have agreed on a new strategic direction for the community (concept note available here. The Community is…
Hello Hannah and other CoP members for very insightful contributions. It has been through provoking reading from you.
Over my short stint in the reform outfit in my country, I have come to appreciate that the software of managing for development re…